
Here are examples of the same link showing how easy it is to transform a simple link:
bit.ly shortened: http://bit.ly/a4M0Ar
bit.ly shortened and customized: http://bit.ly/twitterwithtopsy - notice how the code has been replaced with our choice of wording.
Each of these links will take a reader to the same place, just how that seems to make the difference.
Word of Caution
Third parties - using original links ensures only the site hoster and reader share information on the link, whereas using URL redirection tools will make that information available to the service company who can track traffic to the link
Reliability - it is fair to assume that the link is only as valid as the site hosting it....what happens if that site crashes or is withdrawn? All links vanish too, not ideal if you have invested time putting your links out there in the first place
Privacy - always aware of entering our personal information online in order to avoid phishing scams, are we now encouraging readers to click on a link with no clear idea of where it will take them.
Recently Twitter and Google have announced the introduction of URL shortening within their sites with the specific intention of following bit.ly. One thing is clear, the practice of URL shortening does have a valuable place for those looking to share their work on the web, but as always requires consideration for the consequences.
ARE Creative's view:
We prefer using the customization tool in bit.ly (shown above), at least it does give our readers a preview of where we want to direct them.
Worth a read...
Where are you directing your social media contacts?
Firefox and bit.ly team up for great social bookmarking
1 comment:
Very true, I've just experienced a link being removed from hosting just a couple of days after posting it ... it's very frustrating and I'm now resorting to link shorteners built into my content management system instead. Much, much more effective in the long term.
Post a Comment